Quantcast
Channel: Recommended
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 35863

SAY WHAT? Jill Stein says Trump less Dangerous Than Clinton. Calls Sanders a DC Insider.

$
0
0

What can you say? This is some real screwed up thinking by Stein.

Jill Stein, to me, is nothing but another Nader. She’s literally willing to sacrifice the country to a madman, by peeling away votes. If you’re thinking third party and it's someone like Jill Stein you’re considering, think of the consequences. Because Jill Stein sure isn't thinking about her country, when she spews this type of garbage.

www.rawstory.com/…

Trump less dangerous? This is totally out there. If a third party candidate like Stein is thinking this way, you’re wasting your vote here. This makes absolutely no sense and your vote for Stein could elect the so-called less dangerous Trump. 

Would you want to test her theory? Hell to the no!

While she describes Trump as a danger she also believes he’s nothing more than a moron who has destroyed the GOP. Clinton, on the other hand, she considers a greater threat.

“Donald Trump, I think, will have a lot of trouble moving things through Congress,” Stein says. “Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, won’t … Hillary has the potential to do a whole lot more damage, get us into more wars, faster to pass her fracking disastrous climate program, much more easily than Donald Trump could do his.”

Yes, Bernie is a team player. Bernie doesn't want what he and his loyal supporters worked hard for to be flushed down the toilet with a Trump presidency. This all or nothing attitude of Stein’s is exactly what’s wrong with her candidacy. 

While Stein might seem like the liberal option to moderate Clinton values, she also took a few punches at progressive leader Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) as another Washington insider.

“I’ve tried to talk with Bernie, but, you know, Bernie is — he is a team player,” she said, saying he refuses to speak to her. “I think he’s on the wrong team, perhaps because he’s been in Washington, D.C., too long, because he used to really understand independent politics and why we cannot have a viable political system unless we have independent political parties.” She concludes that it could be “a generational thing.”

Think about these statements and remember 2000. We would have been better off without Bush and we sure as hell will be better off without Trump.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 35863

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>